How OREF-funded Research has Helped Your Practice
Total Joint
“Decisions that have a major impact on the practice of orthopaedics are often made by policy-makers behind closed doors, without input or involvement from orthopaedic surgeons. We need more research that brings relevant clinical knowledge, objective data, and hard science to inform those decisions." Topic: Using clinical and economic outcome data to influence U.S. health policy. Potential Patient Care Application of Results: |
Topic: Tested materials used for joint replacement and fracture care to assess biocompatibility and toxicity to better understand the variables that determine the success or failure of orthopaedic implants. Results: Helped develop new materials for joint replacement and fracture care. Patient Care Application of Results: Better, longer-lasting prosthetic joints, and improved methods for caring of fractures.
| |
| ||
“This line of research helped improve the durability of total joint replacement. Without the OREF grant, it probably would not have been done.” Topic: Investigated whether mixing times might contribute to bone cement performance in total joint replacement. Patient Care Application of Results: Longer mixing times for bone cement helps prevent crack flow, making replacement joints more durable and diminishing the need for additional surgeries. |
“Without the OREF award, I would not have been able to dedicate the time to this research, and thanks to the Clinician Scientist Award, now I'm able to dedicate 50% to 60% of my time to research without having to endure a huge economic penalty by losing my clinical revenue.” Topic: Investigating Smart Implants with biological surfaces. Patient Care Application of Results: Improved longevity of the artificial joints and aversion of the psychological and economic costs to patients. Learn more about Dr. Parvizi's research
|
|
|